Armenia’s economy is entering a fundamentally new phase. In 2022-2024, Yerevan was able to demonstrate high growth rates and present them as evidence of the resilience of the national economy. However, the results of the first quarter of 2026 reveal a more complex picture. Growth continues, but its quality, structure and sources no longer look as convincing. The main conclusion is that the Armenian economy is gradually losing the external impulse that accelerated it after the start of the Russia-Ukraine war. The re-export channel to Russia, which became one of the key drivers of economic growth, is narrowing, while no full-fledged domestic engines capable of replacing this source of growth have yet emerged.

In 2022-2023, Armenia became one of the beneficiaries of the changed geo-economic environment. Sanctions against Russia, the restructuring of trade routes, the relocation of some businesses and specialists, the rise in financial transfers and the expansion of intermediary trade operations created an unusually favorable environment for the Armenian economy. Additional commodity and financial flows began to pass through Armenia, many of which were linked not to the growth of the country’s own production capacity, but to its role in new logistics and trade schemes.

That is why the high growth figures of those years should be treated with caution. They did not mean that Armenia had undergone deep structural modernization. There was no major industrial breakthrough, no sharp increase in labor productivity, no creation of a strong export base and no technological leap. A significant part of the growth was driven by an external shock and temporary circumstances. Armenia became an intermediary link in trade with the Russian market, and this produced a rapid but not necessarily sustainable economic effect.

Today, this effect is gradually fading. In January-March 2026, Armenia’s GDP grew by 4.0% in real terms and amounted to $6.28 billion at current prices. Formally, this is a positive indicator. However, compared with previous years, it points to a clear slowdown. In the first quarter of 2023, economic growth stood at 12.1%; in the first quarter of 2024, it was 9.2%; and in the first quarter of 2025, it reached 5.2%. The trajectory is therefore obvious: each following year shows a lower growth rate.

Photo: Getty Images

This slowdown is especially important because it exposes the real dependence of Armenia’s economy on external factors. As long as the re-export channel was operating at full capacity, the statistics created the impression of successful economic development. But as this channel began to shrink, and as the effects of relocation and financial flows weakened, it became clear that Armenia’s own production base is not strong enough to maintain the previous pace of growth.

The sectoral structure of the economy confirms this problem. In the first quarter of 2026, industry grew by 13.4%, construction by 22.0%, and services by 7.4%. At first glance, these numbers look positive. But they do not indicate balanced economic development. Growth is concentrated in a limited number of areas and does not cover the entire economic system. Moreover, sectors that are important for broad employment and sustainable domestic development are showing weak or negative dynamics.

Trade grew by only 2.1% in the first quarter of 2026. For Armenia, this is particularly revealing, because the trade sector was one of the main beneficiaries of the re-export model in previous years. When trade was expanding rapidly, it was linked not only to domestic consumption, but also to the increase in operations involving the resale of goods to the Russian market. Today, the weak dynamics of trade show that the old source of acceleration is no longer working at the same scale.

The situation in agriculture is even more alarming, with a decline of 5.2% recorded in the first quarter. For a country with a limited resource base and a significant role of agriculture in employment, this is a serious signal. Agriculture not only supplies the domestic market but also acts as an important social stabilizer. Its decline means that economic growth is not being distributed evenly and is not creating a solid foundation for regional development.

The construction sector, by contrast, posted strong growth of 22.0%. Yet here, too, there are questions about sustainability. Construction often responds to short-term financial flows, rising demand for real estate, migration processes and public spending. If these factors weaken, a construction boom can quickly lose momentum. Therefore, strong construction growth alone is not proof of the long-term strength of the economy. It may indicate activity, but not necessarily deep modernization.

Industrial growth also requires cautious assessment. An increase of 13.4% looks significant, but it is important to understand which industries are driving this growth and how much of it is connected to the expansion of competitive production. If industrial dynamics are supported by individual sectors or temporary demand, they do not necessarily translate into sustainable development. For Armenia, the key question is whether industry can become an independent source of exports, jobs and technological renewal. So far, the data for the first quarter do not provide sufficient grounds to speak of such a shift.

Foreign trade is one of the most important indicators of what is happening. In the first quarter of 2026, Armenia’s foreign trade turnover amounted to $4.7 billion, up 4.6% compared with the same period last year. Exports reached $1.76 billion, while imports amounted to $2.95 billion. At first glance, this appears to be a recovery after a decline. In reality, however, it looks weak and unstable, especially when compared with the abnormally high levels of 2024.

The year 2024 was largely the peak of the re-export model. Foreign trade indicators were inflated by unusual flows of goods linked to the Russian direction. Therefore, the current figures should be assessed not only in comparison with 2025, when there was a sharp decline, but also against the level the economy demonstrated at the height of the external boom. From this perspective, the recovery in 2026 looks limited. It does not indicate a new export breakthrough; rather, it reflects an attempt to stabilize after a fall.

It is especially telling that in March 2026, foreign trade turnover declined both month-on-month and year-on-year. This points to the continued instability of trade dynamics. If the economy had truly moved toward a new sustainable export model, foreign trade would have shown more confident and consistent growth. Instead, the current picture suggests that trade flows remain dependent on external conditions and lack a strong domestic foundation.

The problem is that Armenia did not manage to turn the temporary benefits of the re-export boom into long-term productive capital. Temporary revenues could have been used to create new industries, develop infrastructure, expand export-oriented sectors and increase competitiveness. But the current structure of growth shows that such a qualitative transition has not taken place. The economy received an impulse, but it did not fully transform it into a sustainable development model.

Against this backdrop, inflationary pressure is also increasing. In January-March 2026, consumer prices rose by 4.2% compared with the same period last year. In March, annual inflation stood at 4.5%, while monthly inflation reached 0.7%. An even more important signal comes from producer prices for industrial goods, which rose by 9.2% in the first quarter. This means that cost pressures in the economy are intensifying.

For Armenia, this creates a double challenge. On the one hand, economic growth is slowing. On the other, prices are beginning to rise faster. This combination is dangerous because it narrows the room for maneuver for both businesses and the state. Businesses face rising costs, households face pressure on purchasing power, and the authorities must simultaneously support economic activity and contain inflation.

Photo: Getty Images

Households with low and middle incomes are particularly vulnerable in such a situation. If economic growth is not accompanied by a sustainable rise in real incomes, inflation quickly erodes its social effect. As a result, positive GDP statistics may not be felt by the population as an improvement in living standards. This is one of the key problems of the Armenian economy: growth exists, but its social return remains limited.

The labor market confirms this contradictory picture. In the first quarter of 2026, the unemployment rate stood at 12.8%. This is lower than in the first quarter of 2025, when it was 13.9%, and lower than the 15.5% recorded in the first quarter of 2024. In addition, by April 1, 2026, the number of officially registered unemployed people had fallen to 27,200. Formally, this looks like an improvement.

However, the problem lies not only in the unemployment rate, but also in the quality of employment. The economy may create jobs in construction, services or short-term sectors, but this does not necessarily mean the formation of sustainable and highly productive employment. For Armenia’s long-term development, jobs are needed in industry, exports, technology, processing, logistics and high-value services. So far, the structure of growth does not show that these areas have become the foundation of the economy.

Weak trade dynamics and the decline in agriculture also limit employment opportunities. These sectors are important for broad layers of the population, especially outside the capital. If growth is concentrated in certain urban and construction-related segments, it may deepen internal imbalances. GDP may grow, while regional development, household incomes and the quality of jobs remain problematic.

The fiscal situation adds another layer of risk. As of March 31, 2026, Armenia’s total public debt stood at $14.1 billion. This is higher than at the end of 2025, when the figure was $13.9 billion. Debt growth is not always a critical problem in itself, especially if borrowed funds are directed toward development, infrastructure and productivity gains. But if debt rises amid slowing economic growth and the absence of strong domestic drivers, the risks increase.

High public debt limits the possibilities of fiscal policy. In the short term, it allows the government to finance spending and support economic activity. But in the medium term, debt-servicing costs rise. This means that a growing share of budget resources may be spent not on development, but on meeting financial obligations. For a small economy, this is especially sensitive.

Moreover, high debt may limit the government’s ability to respond to new crises. If the external environment worsens, trade continues to slow and inflationary pressure increases, the government will need more resources to support the economy. But the higher the debt burden, the less room there is for such action. In this sense, debt becomes not just a financial indicator, but a strategic constraint.

As a result, Armenia faces a serious dilemma. The old model, based on the benefits of re-export and external conditions, no longer delivers the same results. A new model based on domestic production, exports, investment and productivity growth has not yet been formed. The economy is in a transitional state: the old source of growth is weakening, while a new one has not yet appeared.

This is the main meaning of the data for the first quarter of 2026. Armenia is not in an immediate economic crisis. Growth continues, several sectors show positive dynamics, and the labor market demonstrates some signs of improvement. But behind these figures lies a deeper problem: the economy is becoming less stable, less balanced and more dependent on a limited number of factors.

In 2022-2024, the Armenian economy received a unique external opportunity. But that opportunity was linked not to the internal strength of the economy, but to changes in the regional and international environment. Now, as the re-export valve is gradually closing, it is becoming clear that this period was not used to create a fully-fledged new economic base. The country received rapid growth, but it did not achieve sufficient structural transformation.

For Armenia’s further development, this is no longer enough. The economy needs new sources of growth: competitive industry, diversified exports, modernization of agriculture, infrastructure development, technological investment and higher labor productivity. Without these, any positive figures will remain vulnerable to changes in the external environment.

The results of the first quarter of 2026 show that Armenia’s economy is returning from a period of artificially accelerated growth to a more realistic state. This state is not catastrophic, but it is far less favorable than the statistics of previous years may have suggested. The main problem is that beyond the re-export model, Armenia still lacks sufficiently strong internal mechanisms of development.

Therefore, the current slowdown is not just a temporary decline in growth rates. It is a signal that an entire stage is coming to an end - a stage in which external circumstances allowed Armenia to grow faster than its own economic capabilities would normally permit. Now that gap is narrowing. And it is now becoming clear how fragile the growth model was when it rested on someone else’s crisis, external flows and re-exports to Russia.